Roscoe Tanner vs John Feaver Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
R. Tanner vs J. Feaver

Roscoe Tanner

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

John Feaver

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Tanner 1 - 0 Feaver

They have played 2 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 2 and John Feaver winning 0. The last match between Roscoe Tanner and John Feaver was at the Roland Garros, 04-06-1975, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 6-0 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Tanner	1
Feaver	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R1) Roland Garros(06-04-75)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

John Feaver

R. Tanner vs J. Feaver H2H Profile

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Feaver
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
66.67% (604-302)	Career Total W/L	32.89% (100-204)
1	Clay	0
17	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

R. Tanner vs J. Feaver Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of points on their second serve, while John Feaver has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Roscoe Tanner, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while John Feaver has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Roscoe Tanner has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas John Feaver has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with John Feaver winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Roscoe Tanner has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 116/ 42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 98/ 59). John Feaver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 48/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 31% (W/L 22/ 48).
Player level: In the last year, Roscoe Tanner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as John Feaver has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Roscoe Tanner winning 1 times and John Feaver being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Roscoe Tanner winning 2 and John Feaver winning 0. The last match between Roscoe Tanner and John Feaver was at the Roland Garros, 04-06-1975, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Roscoe Tanner getting the victory 6-0 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Roscoe Tanner has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while John Feaver has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Roscoe Tanner has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while John Feaver has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Roscoe Tanner has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and John Feaver has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Roscoe Tanner vs John Feaver Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

R. Tanner vs J. Feaver H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Feaver
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

R. Tanner Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 28-01-1985
R2 Zoltan KuharszkyZ. Kuharszky	L	7-5 6-7 6-4	Stats
Tel Aviv - 10-09-1984
R3 Amos MansdorfA. Mansdorf	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
US Open - 28-08-1984
R1 Matt DoyleM. Doyle	L	6-2 6-2 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 20-08-1984
R2 Jimmy ConnorsJ. Connors	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Columbus - 13-08-1984
R3 Tim GulliksonT. Gullikson	L	5-7 6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

J. Feaver Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wimbledon - 25-06-1984
R1 Greg HolmesG. Holmes	L	6-1 6-3 6-7 6-2	Stats
Bahrain CH - 05-03-1984
R3 Nduka OdizorN. Odizor	W	6-4 6-7 6-3	Stats
R4 Marcel FreemanM. Freeman	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Le Touquet CH - 15-08-1983
R3 Fernando SolerF. Soler	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Roland Garros - 23-05-1983
R1 Eddie EdwardsE. Edwards	L	3-6 6-2 6-3 7-6	Stats

View All

R. Tanner vs J. Feaver Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

R. Tanner	Stats	J. Feaver
66.67% (604/302)	YTD Win/Loss	32.67% (99/204)
63.03% (1439/844)	Sets Win/Loss	38.47% (302/483)
54.41% (12342/10342)	Games Win/Loss	46.68% (3548/4052)
66.98% (215/106)	Hard Win/Loss	33.33% (14/28)
62.42% (98/59)	Clay Win/Loss	35.56% (48/87)
64.66% (161/88)	Indoor Hard W/L	25.00% (10/30)
73.42% (116/42)	Grass Win/Loss	31.43% (22/48)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
549.44	Average Opponent Rank	566.95
73.17% (90/33)	Slam W/L	30.95% (13/29)
54.39% (31/26)	Masters W/L	40.00% (2/3)
69.23% (9/4)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/4)
66.48% (474/239)	Main Tour W/L	28.72% (56/139)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	49.12% (28/29)
67% (505/759)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	34% (87/259)
67% (90/134)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	26% (11/42)
39% (15/38)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
56% (161/288)	Deciding Set Win %	33% (38/114)
86% (596/514)	1st Set Won, Won Match	63% (111/70)
14% (596/82)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	36% (111/40)
28% (299/83)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	15% (191/28)